Peer Review Policy

1. Introduction

The "Journal of Religion and Society" (JRS) is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that contributes to the understanding of the complex relationship between religion and society. To ensure the quality and rigor of its publications, JRS employs a double-blind peer review process. This policy outlines the principles and procedures governing the review process.

2. Review Process

• Manuscript Submission: All manuscripts submitted to JRS undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their adherence to the journal's aims and scope, as well as basic formatting and quality standards.
• Double-Blind Review: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to two anonymous reviewers with expertise in the relevant field(s). Reviewers are selected based on their qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.
• Reviewer Responsibilities: Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and objective feedback on the manuscript, focusing on its originality, significance, methodological soundness, clarity, and overall contribution to the field. They should also identify any potential ethical concerns or plagiarism.
• Author Response: Authors are provided with the reviewers' comments and have the opportunity to respond to them, addressing any concerns and providing revisions to their manuscript.
• Editorial Decision: The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Associate Editors, makes the final decision on the manuscript based on the reviewers' reports, the author's response, and the overall assessment of the manuscript's quality and fit for the journal.

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers will evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

• Originality and Significance: Does the manuscript present a new and important contribution to the field of religion and society?
• Methodology: Is the research methodology sound and appropriate for the research question?
• Analysis and Interpretation: Are the data and findings analyzed and interpreted in a rigorous and convincing manner?
• Clarity and Conciseness: Is the manuscript written in a clear, concise, and well-organized style?
• References and Citations: Are the references and citations accurate and complete?
• Ethical Considerations: Does the research adhere to ethical principles and guidelines?

4. Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest

• Blind Review: Reviewers and authors are kept anonymous throughout the review process to ensure unbiased evaluation.
• Conflict of Interest: Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as personal or professional relationships with the authors or their institutions.